Anthropic frontend-design
Agents doing page-level UI direction before code changes
loading
Browse the Boostor skill library by workflow, runtime, and level. Open any skill to inspect what it does, where it helps, and when to use it.
No terminal required: open a skill, inspect the fit, then add it when the install path is ready.
Category lanes
13 lanesCredited GitHub sources for UI/UX review, frontend polish, visual QA, product copy, design systems, and brandbook creation. These are reference sources, not Boostor-owned installs.
Agents doing page-level UI direction before code changes
Audit a landing page for buyer, pain, proof, offer, and next action — every fix tied to a visible change.
Growth
63 skills
likes update liveSweep a page for the accessibility issues that block users — semantics, keyboard, contrast, forms, SR.
Honest about its limits: it labels automated vs manual findings and won't claim WCAG compliance from a script — but it catches the real blockers.
Score a batch of ad variants on angle, clarity, proof, and risk — and suggest distinct next angles.
Stops a batch of ad variants from being ten takes on one weak angle — scores each on proof and risk, then pushes distinct next angles.
Review an agent's logging so a production failure can be replayed without exposing secrets.
Sets the bar at replaying a real failure from the trace without leaking secrets — and catches teams logging cost but not per-step cause.
Threat-review an agent system for prompt injection, secret exposure, over-broad tools, and ungated actions.
Reviews the tool permissions, not just the prompt — where most agent security actually fails. Pairs with prompt-injection-shield for the fixes.
Audit product analytics for missing events, vague names, and payload gaps tied to real funnel questions.
Ties every event to a decision question and flags PII in payloads — so your analytics answers funnel questions instead of just piling up.
Audit pages for AI-answer citation honestly — crawl, index, and snippet proof before any lift claim.
The honest AEO audit: no citation-lift claim without before/after proof, and it won't pretend an llms.txt file is a ranking guarantee.
Keep frontend and backend in sync by enforcing OpenAPI contracts in CI.
Catches the frontend/backend drift that bites in production — it diffs the OpenAPI contract on every PR so a breaking route fails CI, not your users.
Pull AI copy back to brand voice, flag banned phrases, and mark any claim that still needs proof.
Fixes voice without flattening you into generic SaaS copy — it preserves the specifics and flags the claims that still need proof.
Let your agent browse, click, and fill forms like a real user.
Gives your agent a browser without brittle selectors — the self-healing locator survives the DOM changes that break every hand-written scraper.
Generate human-readable changelogs from git history and PR descriptions.
Turns git log into a changelog a human would actually read, grouped by feature, fix, and breaking change — the release chore most teams skip until launch day.
Turn scattered interviews and support notes into churn themes, each backed by a real quote.
Every churn theme carries a real quote or gets marked a hypothesis — so one offhand comment never becomes a roadmap decision.
Find the first real failure in a CI log and return the owner, fix path, and rerun command.
Points at the first failing command, not the loudest warning — and stops the agent from editing before it has even read the error.
Build a ledger of competitor claims labeled verified, public-surface, inferred, weak, or unsupported.
Separates a competitor's marketing claim from hands-on proof and keeps the unknowns honest — instead of overrating a slick landing page.
Auto-generate Storybook stories and prop docs from React component source.
Storybook stories are the docs nobody writes. This reads your component types and generates the stories and prop tables so the chore stops being optional.
Rank decaying pages by stale claims, intent drift, and broken links — and say refresh vs rewrite vs delete.
Ranks decaying pages by real evidence and tells you refresh vs rewrite vs delete — not just bumping the date and calling it updated.
Keep long-running agents under token limits without losing critical state.
The fix for the wall every long-running agent hits — it summarizes old turns before the context window blows, instead of crashing mid-task.
Summarize contract redlines into changed terms, business impact, and what needs legal review.
Surfaces the commercial terms that bite — payment, renewal, liability — and flags what needs counsel, without pretending to be your lawyer.
Profile a dataset for completeness, duplicates, outliers, and schema issues before anything uses it.
Catches the business-critical nulls and duplicate keys before a report depends on them — concrete column-level issues, no hand-wavy causal claims.
Review a database migration for data-loss, lock risk, and missing rollback before you apply it.
Reads a migration the way production will: full tables, real locks, and a rollback you actually have — catches data-loss before you apply.
Find repeated spacing, type, and color inconsistencies after rapid AI changes — and a convergence plan.
For UIs that fragmented during fast AI changes — it finds the repeated drift and gives a convergence plan, not a redesign.
Build repeatable LLM evals with golden datasets and scoring rubrics.
Most teams ship prompt changes on vibes. This makes model quality a CI gate with golden sets and rubrics, so a regression fails the build like any bug.
Write an A/B test readout that separates significant results from directional signals from noise.
Separates a significant result from a directional signal from noise — and surfaces the sample-size and seasonality caveats before you ship a win.
Create, document, and clean up feature flags across your codebase safely.
Solves flag debt: it tracks every flag and tells you which are safe to delete, then strips the dead branches — so old flags stop rotting in your codebase.
Plan a framework upgrade from current docs — breaking-change checklist, file impact, and verify commands.
Reads the target version's actual changelog instead of trusting training-data memory — the difference between a clean upgrade and a broken build.
Build a role scorecard with competencies, evidence prompts, an interview plan, and a decision rubric.
Replaces hiring-on-vibes with a scorecard tied to observable evidence and clear pass bars — and steers clear of irrelevant criteria.
Write a blameless postmortem with a timeline, root causes, and corrective actions that can be verified.
Blameless by design, and every corrective action gets an owner, a date, and a way to verify it — so the postmortem actually changes something.
Find stale, duplicate, and unowned docs with exact file paths — and a source-of-truth cleanup plan.
Returns exact paths for every stale or duplicate doc and names the source of truth before any rewrite — so the KB stays retrievable.
Audit a landing page for buyer, pain, proof, offer, and next action — every fix tied to a visible change.
Turns a pretty-but-flat page into a punch list — each fix maps to a visible change or a measurement, and it checks mobile first.
Scaffold, test, and publish a Model Context Protocol server in minutes.
Writing an MCP server by hand means hours of boilerplate before the first tool runs. This validates against the spec so you skip the silent-failure stage.
Quality-gate an MCP server for schema clarity, tool risk, auth, error behavior, and smoke tests.
More than a schema check: it gates every MCP tool on inputs, failure behavior, and auth — and catches injection riding in through tool descriptions.
Audit which model each task class uses and where you overpay or risk quality on the wrong tier.
Audits where you overpay and where a cheap model is risking quality — treating latency, cost, and quality as separate per-task requirements.
Coordinate specialist subagents with a LangGraph-powered supervisor loop.
A pre-wired supervisor for routing work to specialist agents, with the retry and observability hooks you'd otherwise rebuild by hand for every project.
Audit a Zapier or Make stack for silent failures, data exposure, duplicate triggers, and missing retries.
Finds the no-code automations failing silently or leaking data — it maps triggers, retries, and owners instead of trusting the UI labels.
Map a first session to its activation moment and fix the friction, empty states, and copy in the way.
Maps the path to the first real result and fixes what stalls users there — tied to time-to-first-value, not to a prettier screen.
Route agent calls to the cheapest capable model via OpenRouter dynamically.
Stops paying GPT-tier prices for tasks a cheap model can do — it classifies each request and routes to the cheapest model that clears the bar, logging the savings.
Turn a workflow that lives in one person's head into an executable runbook with rollback and escalation.
Gets a critical procedure out of one person's head: numbered steps a new operator can run, with the rollback and escalation included.
Automated, opinionated code reviews posted directly to your GitHub PRs.
It posts inline fixes on the PR, not generic warnings you'll ignore — the difference between a review bot people read and one they mute.
Review an AI-generated diff for real regressions and security risk, ordered by severity with verify commands.
Runs in Codex on a raw diff and orders findings by severity with verify commands — built for plausible-looking AI PRs that hide a regression.
Check that pricing copy, plan limits, checkout config, and entitlement code actually agree.
Catches the gap between what the pricing page promises and what the code enforces — before a wrong plan limit turns into a refund.
Map privacy-policy changes against real product behavior and produce review-ready risk questions.
Maps policy changes to real data flows and produces review-ready questions — explicitly not legal advice, which is exactly why it's safe to use.
Detect and neutralize prompt injection attempts before they reach your agent.
A lightweight first filter for obvious injection attempts. Honest caveat: detection alone is unreliable — pair it with prompt-injection-shield for real defense.
Turn a long reusable prompt into a real skill with frontmatter, triggers, a stop condition, and eval cases.
For the prompt you keep re-pasting: it rewrites it as a triggerable skill and scrubs the private paths most people forget to remove.
Wire up a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline from docs to answers.
Skips the where-do-I-start of RAG: ingestion, chunking, and upsert in one config, plus a relevance check so junk chunks never reach the prompt.
Debug a RAG failure by classifying whether it's source, chunking, embedding, ranking, prompt, or synthesis.
Stops you blaming the model for a retrieval bug — it classifies each miss as source, chunking, embedding, ranking, prompt, or synthesis.
Separate local, hosted, payment, auth, and production proof so a green build never gets called release-ready.
Keeps launch proof honest: a passing build, a working checkout, and a live smoke test are tracked as separate lanes — not one green check.
Turn a folder of research into a decision pack with a source matrix, claim ledger, and action backlog.
Turns a research folder into a decision pack with a graded source matrix and an action backlog — not a vague strategy summary.
Generate and validate database migrations from natural-language change requests.
Turns a plain-English schema change into a reviewed migration with rollback steps — and flags the breaking changes before you apply them, not after.
Review screenshots across viewports for overlap, clipping, layout, and responsive breaks.
Systematic visual QA across viewports — it catches the text overflow and clipping a quick glance misses, and won't guess at behavior from a still.
Build a content brief with search intent, an outline, sourced claims, internal links, and success metrics.
A brief a writer can execute: intent, outline, internal links, and a source behind every non-obvious claim instead of invented stats.
Generate a behavior eval suite for a skill — trigger, anti-trigger, output-contract, and failure cases.
Complements the eval-harness runner: this one writes the cases, including the anti-triggers and failure paths most authors never test.
Score an agent skill folder for vague triggers, missing evals, and unproven claims before you publish it.
Built for the moment before you publish a skill: it separates a polished README from a runnable one and names the exact missing pieces.
Add a sources ledger to a research-heavy skill so every factual claim maps to a graded source.
Honest fix for skills that assert facts without backing them — every claim either gets a graded source or gets downgraded.
Draft a launch thread with hook variants, proof points, objections, a CTA, and an asset checklist.
Demands a real proof point behind every claim and rejects fake metrics — a launch thread that connects problem to proof, not hype.
Classify incoming support messages, draft on-policy replies, and escalate the cases you shouldn't auto-answer.
Drafts on-policy replies but refuses to auto-answer billing, legal, security, or angry tickets — the cases that need a human.
Cut an agent's tool scopes to least privilege — required actions in, write and delete gated.
Does the tedious least-privilege pass teams skip — strips scopes a task doesn't need without breaking reads, and gates write and delete.
Audit a workflow for friction by user task — each finding tied to a task, not personal taste.
Ties every finding to a real user task, not taste — and checks keyboard and mobile, so it catches interfaces that look fine but slow work down.
Brief a software or AI vendor on capability fit, evidence gaps, lock-in, and data risk.
Separates a vendor's marketing claims from audited proof and surfaces the lock-in and data-export risks before you commit, not after.
Turn plain HTML into polished, design-system-ready UIs with one prompt.
For builders who can ship logic but freeze on design — the critique loop scores the UI before commit, so taste isn't left to luck.
Scope a workflow before automating it — and say 'keep it manual' when risk or ambiguity is high.
Will tell you to keep a workflow manual when risk is high — it scopes the automation before you build something brittle around an unmapped process.
Analyze and cut GitHub Actions spend by rewriting slow, expensive workflows.
Aimed at the one bill teams forget to read — it profiles your Actions YAML against real billing data and estimates the savings before touching anything.
Trace, diff, and fix broken data transformations in any ETL pipeline.
Debugging an ETL means hunting which transform broke the data. This snapshots each step and walks the diff back to the first failing one for you.
Add real-time speech I/O to any agent with sub-300ms latency.
Real-time voice is brutal to wire — VAD, barge-in, and silence timeouts all have to feel instant. This handles the latency-sensitive plumbing so you don't.
Harden your agent against prompt injection — treat web, file, and MCP output as untrusted and gate risky actions.
The honest take on prompt injection: don't try to detect it, defuse it. It enforces the lethal-trifecta budget and gates risky actions — defense that actually holds.
Sweep a page for the accessibility issues that block users — semantics, keyboard, contrast, forms, SR.
Community likes help surface what builders actually endorse, not who paid.
Usage signals are included when telemetry is real, so the index can mature without fake install numbers.
Struggle-points are labelled for beginners, the friction nobody else writes down.
No pay-to-rank. No fake command-line proof. The library is listed first, install flow second.
Featured skills
levelsStart each UI pass by naming the subject, audience, page job, signature visual, and anti-template critique before touching components.
Do not copy Anthropic or Claude visual language, typography, layout tropes, or exact prompt wording.
Every Boostor UI polish task must open with subject, audience, route job, evidence state, and the one product surface the page should make clearer.
Agents reviewing working UI against task, craft, trust, and accessibility criteria
Review whether a screen completes the job, earns trust, follows design tokens, survives responsive states, and remains accessible.
Do not force a Figma-first process when Boostor truth comes from code, route behavior, Convex-backed state, and live proof.
A Boostor review must separate product truth, visual craft, accessibility, responsive fit, and proof language instead of collapsing them into one approval.
Agents verifying rendered browser behavior and visual fit
Treat functional QA, visual QA, viewport fit, and claim verification as separate checks with separate evidence.
Do not treat one passing screenshot, local browser route, or copied command as launch proof.
Boostor proof language must distinguish local prototype, preview, deployed page, Convex-backed state, Pro entitlement, and real purchase verification.
Agents that need DOM, accessibility, and browser automation evidence
Use browser and accessibility snapshots to support design review, especially where text overflow, focus order, or hidden state may not show in static screenshots.
Do not let automation output replace human visual judgment or current product truth checks.
Every important Boostor surface needs browser evidence and human visual inspection before stronger public claims.
Agents reviewing diffs and working routes before merge
Keep a diff-aware design review loop that checks brand memory, Playwright evidence, accessibility, and responsive behavior.
Do not copy Claude-specific command wiring into Codex without adapting invocation, permissions, and proof gates.
Boostor review agents must name the exact changed routes, evidence gathered, and residual risk rather than giving blanket approval.
Teams using opinionated agent roles for design, release, and QA
Use before/after screenshot discipline, severity labels, visual regression language, and small fix scopes.
Do not enable automatic commit, push, deploy, or broad fix behavior for research-only or no-code design review.
Boostor design QA findings should include severity, route, screenshot context, and the smallest safe fix scope.
Agents maintaining consistent UI taste across repeated changes
Persist local design decisions around spacing, surfaces, card rules, interaction rules, and review constraints.
Do not create a second hidden brand system that conflicts with Boostor's brandbook or source-of-truth docs.
Boostor must have one visible brand contract; agent memory can reference it but cannot silently fork it.
Frontend teams documenting component states and catching visual drift
Document important component states and run visual regression for dense dashboards, empty states, and responsive card grids.
Do not confuse visual regression with taste. Regression catches drift; it does not decide whether the brand feels right.
Boostor components need named states for loading, empty, error, signed-out, signed-in, Pro, and entitled user modes.
Product teams needing accessible primitives and dense developer-product UI
Use accessible primitives, tokenized components, predictable menus, and dense developer-product affordances.
Do not ship generic shadcn SaaS pages, GitHub-looking chrome, or component-library defaults as Boostor identity.
Boostor can use familiar primitives, but route composition, copy, proof labels, and artifact surfaces must feel specific to AI builders.
Agents applying product, messaging, typography, and heuristic review lenses
Use focused product-copy lenses such as JTBD, messaging clarity, typography checks, and heuristic UX review.
Do not copy book-derived frameworks, proprietary training text, or generic positioning language.
Boostor copy should convert outside frameworks into route-specific, proof-aware rules written in Boostor's own voice.
Teams turning design skills and systems into reusable brand contracts
Treat DESIGN.md or Brandbook rules as a versioned contract that agents can apply consistently across surfaces.
Do not copy other brands' design systems, especially Linear, Stripe, Vercel, Claude, or GitHub-style shells.
Boostor's brandbook needs explicit color, type, spacing, surface, motion, voice, proof-label, and anti-pattern rules.
Agents drafting early brand identity, voice, and guideline artifacts
Use the workflow shape: positioning, voice, visual brief, messaging, and guidelines.
Do not treat low-popularity or early-stage brand workflows as authoritative output; use them as checklist inspiration only.
Brandbook generation should be checklist-driven but must resolve against Boostor product truth before any final wording lands.
Agents coordinating role-based design, content, dashboard, and accessibility reviews
Map review roles such as content designer, design-system lead, dashboard architect, accessibility auditor, and design QA.
Do not install a large command set or generate agency-template dashboards when Boostor needs product-specific operating surfaces.
Boostor design agents should use named review roles, but each role must return concrete route findings and proof boundaries.
Teams writing product and UX handoffs before implementation
Use structured product and UX handoffs before build work so agents know the user, surface, constraints, and acceptance evidence.
Do not impose heavy planning ceremony on small copy or polish passes.
Boostor handoffs should stay lightweight until risk, scope, or proof requirements justify heavier planning.
Submit it for the ranked board. If it earns its spot, it gets featured and climbs the leaderboard, no selling, just signal.